Kona vs Saracen - halp me Retro-bike Kenobi

TomvanHalen

Dirt Disciple
Feedback
View
I currently have this '97 Kona Koa, which is excellent fun



I have the opportunity to purchase this '96(?) Kili Comp frameset



I only have room for one mtb, and as far as I can tell, the Saracen weighs up as follows.

Pros:
- Decent steel. Tange MTB(??)/Prestige DB tubing, Ritchey dropouts
^ - tougher construction
^ - better ride (?????)
- Better fit for me (1" longer TT, 2" longer ST, 2.5cm longer HT)
- Quite classy

Cons:
- Heavier (probably)
- Even shorter forks (385 vs 400 as best as I could tell)
- Forks maybe not as good as P2s (though I don't have the triple butted)
- Not outrageously orange
- Not a Kona

Out of all of this, the fact that I would feel happier with the fit running a shorter stem and slighter wider bars, and the steel construction (and possible resulting toughness and ride quality) are most swaying me. But I'd like to hear your thoughts, especially as I can't directly compare the frames myself unless I rebuild
 
Re:

It's a toughie! There's those who swear by both brands.. I've personally never ridden or Owned a Saracen but am quote fond of them in general, I have rode, bought and sold no less than 10 Konas though over the years :)

The Kili is from a good period for the brand and is certainly a nice enough blend of tubes but will definitely ride diffently to the Kona, being steel for one. The rigid forks seem to have a good reputation and are quite hard to come by so I would not be too put off by them.

Is there any chance to do a quick build and try it out? I'm sure that you wouldn't have too much trouble moving one on once a decision be made (or not, as others on here will testify) :wink:
 
I had the same Saracen frame in my teens with a pair of Pace RC35's and mainly XT, loved it. Swapped it for for a GT Pantera, wished I'd kept it :( Buy it, build it the way you would as if you knew you were keeping it and then decide. You can always make room for one more bike!
 
Back
Top