Jimmy, my comment wasn't aimed at your bike, it was my thought in general. However, I did narrow my vote down to your entry but I just couldn't do it with my opinion such as it is.I pictured it as I ride it...I don't have the time or inclination to swap tyres around just to photograph it, to then swap back when I ride it...It was literally fresh out of the stand, I was excited and is hardly a catalogue build anyway...What it is (IMO) is a lovely, well built example of a desirable retro bike....That rides AMAZINGLY as it is, thanks to the components and tyres that are fitted...Sue me!
...Still love you all...
(My Zaskar has the same tyres...So you're going to HATE that!!) 
I like this aspect too.
Personally I have two main things that put me off voting for a bike;
Mr Oldschool, I lean in the opposite direction of the"period tire" crowd. I'd rather see a rider on useful tires than a wall hanger on cracked old rubber. My vote is based on the bike, not a formula decided thirty years ago. If everyone followed the same pattern, we'd basically all be building the same bike and the contest would stagnate. Thanks for keeping it freshI pictured it as I ride it...I don't have the time or inclination to swap tyres around just to photograph it, to then swap back when I ride it...It was literally fresh out of the stand, I was excited and is hardly a catalogue build anyway...What it is (IMO) is a lovely, well built example of a desirable retro bike....That rides AMAZINGLY as it is, thanks to the components and tyres that are fitted...Sue me!
...Still love you all...
I like this aspect too.
I know some people take the actual photograph into consideration for example, or the location of the picture, I don't care at all about that, I'm voting for the bike. But if that's part of your criteria then that's fair enough.
