not a good look ...

[02gf74]

..... but it kinda makes sense, aerodynamically wise. (I refer to the fairing in front of the seat tube)

seatpost looks like it is back to front but isn't .

also notice how the fork and stem blend seamlessly into the frame. anybody want to guess how much £ ?

 

[Rampage]

Hideous!
£6k?

 

[euphras_1]

Is it built pre-1996?

 

[02gf74]

Is it built pre-1996?

one moment, I need to check .......

(£ 7.2 k) for that amount you can get one of these and still have 500 quidsies left over for road tax and petrol

 

[one-eyed_jim]

(I refer to the fairing in front of the seat tube)

It's actually a water bottle and cage:

http://www.torhans.com/vr.html

The UCI requires a bicycle to have an open triangular frame. It's more aerodynamic to fill the triangle with a bottle, and the rules permit it.

This isn't retro though. Couldn't you have put it in a more appropriate place?

 

[kaiser]

Moved to G+OT. Whilst no one of my favourite looking aero bikes beauty is in the eye of the beholder and all that. The more you look at them and see the differences the more you appreciate them.

 

[firedfromthecircus]

Moved to G+OT. Whilst no one of my favourite looking aero bikes beauty is in the eye of the beholder and all that. The more you look at them and see the differences the more you appreciate them.

Come on Klaus. :shock:
Yer havin a laugh.

It's a total minger. :twisted:

 

[kaiser]

Think of it more Nissan Skyline attractive than Porsche.

Still It'd be a P5 for me if I had to choose

 

[dbmtb]

Only someone with the taste gene of the triathlete could love one of these ugly babies.